Curated News
By: NewsRamp Editorial Staff
July 24, 2026
Ireland Bans Electroshock Treatment on Minors, CCHR Applauds
TLDR
- Ireland's ban on ECT for minors offers a legal precedent for advocates pushing similar restrictions in the U.S.
- ECT delivers up to 460 volts to the brain, causing memory loss and brain damage; Ireland banned it for under-18s.
- Ireland's law protects minors from brain-damaging electroshock, advancing human rights and dignity in mental health care.
- CCHR helped ban ECT on minors in California, Texas, and Western Australia, and now Ireland joins the list.
Impact - Why it Matters
This news matters because it represents a significant step in protecting minors from a controversial and potentially harmful psychiatric procedure. Ireland's ban sets a precedent that could influence other countries to reassess their own regulations on ECT, particularly for vulnerable populations. For readers, especially parents or advocates for mental health reform, this highlights the ongoing debate about the safety and ethics of electroshock therapy and the importance of human rights in medical practices. The decision reinforces the need for stricter oversight and informed consent, potentially reducing the risk of brain damage and memory loss in young patients.
Summary
In a landmark move for child mental health rights, Ireland has banned electroshock treatment on minors under its new Mental Health Law enacted in May, as announced by the Citizens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHR). The prohibition protects individuals under 18 from electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), which delivers up to 460 volts through the brain and can cause severe memory loss, cognitive impairment, and brain damage. CCHR, a mental health industry watchdog, has a long history of advocating for ECT restrictions, having helped secure the first ban on minors under 12 in California in 1976 and later in Texas for those under 16 in 1993. In Western Australia, CCHR supported a ban on children aged 14 and younger in 2014, with criminal penalties for violators.
In the U.S., the FDA has cleared ECT devices for patients 13 and older for three limited conditions, but the practice is widely used off-label. CCHR President Jan Eastgate praised Ireland's officials for recognizing the need to prohibit ECT on minors up to age 17, but emphasized that the ban should extend to all ages. The newly formed Stop ECT Coalition in the U.S., comprising health and human rights organizations representing hundreds of thousands, is urging a review of how ECT devices remain on the market. ECT devices were "grandfathered" into FDA regulation in 1976 as Class III high-risk devices, bypassing modern premarket approval requiring safety and efficacy trials. In 2018, the FDA reclassified them as moderate risk (Class II) without such trials, allowing use on children as young as five and other vulnerable groups. The Coalition notes that involuntary application, still occurring in some U.S. facilities, has been condemned by the United Nations and World Health Organization as a human-rights abuse.
Experts like Dr. John Read, a professor at the University of East London, describe ECT's effects as akin to closed-brain injury, with studies showing brain changes similar to traumatic brain injury. Robert Rubinstein, a former psychiatry professor, compared ECT to "kicking a Swiss watch," while Dr. Niall McLaren stated, "No psychiatrist needs to use ECT." The World Health Organization has warned of ECT's health risks, including brain damage, cardiovascular complications, memory impairment, and death, and recommends banning it for children. CCHR, established in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and psychiatrist Dr. Thomas Szasz, continues to advocate for informed consent rights and has helped enact hundreds of laws worldwide. For more on CCHR's mission, visit their about page.
Source Statement
This curated news summary relied on content disributed by 24-7 Press Release. Read the original source here, Ireland Bans Electroshock Treatment on Minors, CCHR Applauds
